GitLab

Animal stroop task - based on Reynvoet et al 2021 and adapted for children In the Animal Stroop tasks, participants are instructed to respond to one piece of relevant information about a stimulus while ignoring the other, often more salient, piece of information. Two animals picture are presented on each trial simultaneously. Participants need to indicate which animal is larger in real life and ignore the size of the image. Two large animals (elephant or bear) coupled with two small animals (rabbit or butterfly) are presented. 1/2 congruent trials: the image of the larger real-life animal (elephant or bear) is larger than the smallest animal (butterfly or rabbit). 1/2 incongruent trials: the image of largest real-life animal is presented smaller than the image of the smallest real-life animal. Stimuli are a total of 16 pairs: 2 small animals x 2 large animals x 2 size (congr|incongr) x 2 sides (left|right) 16 practice trials with feedback; 48 test trials fixation cross 500ms Stimulus on the screen until a response is given. Blank screen 500ms Response: 'f' key for left, 'j' for right Inhibition is measured by an interference score for each task by subtracting the mean response time (RT)/mean accuracy on correct congruent trials from the mean RT/mean accuracy on correct incongruent trials.

Animal stroop task - based on Reynvoet et al 2021 and adapted for children In the Animal Stroop tasks, participants are instructed to respond to one piece of relevant information about a stimulus while ignoring the other, often more salient, piece of information. Two animals picture are presented on each trial simultaneously. Participants need to indicate which animal is larger in real life and ignore the size of the image. Two large animals (elephant or bear) coupled with two small animals (rabbit or butterfly) are presented. 1/2 congruent trials: the image of the larger real-life animal (elephant or bear) is larger than the smallest animal (butterfly or rabbit). 1/2 incongruent trials: the image of largest real-life animal is presented smaller than the image of the smallest real-life animal. Stimuli are a total of 16 pairs: 2 small animals x 2 large animals x 2 size (congr|incongr) x 2 sides (left|right) 16 practice trials with feedback; 48 test trials fixation cross 500ms Stimulus on the screen until a response is given. Blank screen 500ms Response: 'f' key for left, 'j' for right Inhibition is measured by an interference score for each task by subtracting the mean response time (RT)/mean accuracy on correct congruent trials from the mean RT/mean accuracy on correct incongruent trials.

Should be OG— re-uploading because never appeared on dashboard

Check the conditions file and the folder structure

Online version of the Psychomotor Vigilance task (Dinges, D. F., & Powell, J. W. (1985). Behav Res Methods Instr Computers, 17, 652-655. Adapted by P Peigneux for UR2NF (https://crcn.ulb.ac.be/lab/ur2nf/) on 29/12/2020 based on mcmahonmc/pvt2 script

Psychomotor Vigilance Task to be run in Pavlovia

incomplete code for a dual task experiment, working memory test and remember/know paradigm

A basic n-back task in which sequential items are presented. Participants must click/tap the screen if this item is the same as n-back.

A demo based on the Eriksen Flanker paradigm. Participants respond to the direction of a central arrow, whilst ignoring distracting flankers.