_
lhu_gp authored
92da158a
Name Last commit Last update
.gitignore Create repository (including .gitignore)
GN.psyexp _
GN_lastrun.py _
README.txt _
stroop_lastrun.py _
trialTypes.csv _
Gender Neutrality
------------------------------------------------------------------

Information
Participants were given sentences one clause at a time and asked to interpret the sentence. Sentences contained a definite ("teacher") or indefinite ("someone") antecedent and a pronoun, either definite ("he" or "she") or indefinite ("they"). The experimenters found that participants could read sentences with "they" as quickly as sentences with a pronoun that did match the stereotypical antecedent and faster than those where the pronoun did not match.
 
This finding implies that "they" can be used effectively as an indefinite pronoun where the gender of the person is unknown or unknowable. The problem with using "they" in English is that prescriptively, it is forbidden (as "they" is technically plural, and cannot be used with singular antecedents). This finding aims to point out that that does not mean people cannot understand the use of singular "they"
 The experiment:   
This experiment presents subjects with 72 trials within one single block. Each trial presents a sentence containing three clauses, one clause at a time. The experiment is self-paced, as subjects press the spacebar to move to the next clause. At the end of each sentence, subjects press 1 to indicate that they agree with the veracity of the sentence, or 2 if they disagree with the veracity of the sentence.

Analysing your data:


Notes: 
    
Americanised language.  

Foertsch, J., and Gernsbacher, M.A. (1997). In search of gender neutrality: Is singular They a cognitively efficient substitute for generic He? Psychological Science, 8, 106-111.